As Trump returns to the White House, his aggressive immigration policies are gaining unexpected support among voters. Are tougher stances on deportation reshaping public opinion in America?
In a controversial move, El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele offers to repatriate 252 Venezuelans deported by the US in exchange for the release of political prisoners held by Nicolás Maduro. This proposal highlights the tense relations between the US, El Salvador, and Venezuela amidst ongoing debates on human rights and immigration.
Kilmar Abrego García's deportation to a Salvadoran megaprison has sparked outrage. Allegations of gang membership, based on questionable evidence, raise serious questions about due process and racial profiling.
In a surprising move, the U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily halted the deportations of Venezuelan gang members, following urgent requests from immigration advocates. This decision comes amid ongoing legal disputes and concerns over due process for detainees.
In a heated Oval Office exchange, President Trump insisted El Salvador's Nayib Bukele should take back a man mistakenly deported to his country. Bukele's firm refusal raises questions about U.S. immigration policy and the handling of alleged gang members.
The Supreme Court's recent ruling allows the Trump administration to resume deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, targeting Venezuelan migrants. While Trump celebrates, legal challenges loom as accused gang members seek justice.
President Trump faces a new legal hurdle over his use of a wartime law to deport Venezuelan gang members. A Manhattan court intervenes, pausing removals for now. What’s next in this unfolding drama?
In a controversial turn of events, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg cancels a hearing on deportations after the Supreme Court clears the way for the Trump administration to act under the Alien Enemies Act, raising concerns over due process.
In a contentious 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court allows the Trump administration to deport alleged gang members under wartime law, but they must have the right to challenge their removal. This decision marks a significant victory for Trump, raising concerns among dissenting justices about the implications for judicial power and individual rights.
The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing the deportation of Venezuelan migrants under an 18th-century law but requiring court hearings to challenge removals. This controversial decision has ignited debate over judicial authority and immigration policy.
